

Nah it’s more than thst. Some of us want to see nsfw stuff occasionally but not have our feed filled up with shout-outs to various niche porn communities.
(He/Him) | 🇬🇧
I like city building games and puzzles. I like other things as well, but that’s not important right now.
My fediverse philosophy is that we should avoid emulating the bad and crude aspects of reddit - don’t abuse the downvote feature, don’t chase ‘karma’ and don’t overuse the word “porn” in subreddit names.


Nah it’s more than thst. Some of us want to see nsfw stuff occasionally but not have our feed filled up with shout-outs to various niche porn communities.
People who recommend negging are evil.
People who recommend looksmaxxing are quite morally questionable because they’re trying to turn dating into a socially darwinistic battle royale, which i guess is in response to the proliferation of dating apps, which they perceive as a socially darwinistic battle royale, in roughly their own words. They also outright lie - no, not everyone likes hunter eyes or sunken cheekbones, tallness, even skinniness, or bulky muscles. This feels like a war against human diversity. And in many cases they pretend these looksmaxxed features just naturally appear when you lead the perfect masculine routine of icebaths, red meat meals and frequent workouts. Which is a lie. (I think stuff like this is why there are articles saying ‘exercise culture is fascist’)
But back to negging: not only is this encouraged by a plurality of random young people online, but it’s weirdly also pushed hard by hollywood & american television - anyone else noticed that?
And negging is ALSO endorsed by, that’s right, none other than Jeffrey Epstein. He had a bunch pf emails going “wow, dude, your negging advice totally works! She wants me more than ever!” So yes, it’s safe to say it’s actually evil. Part and parcel of training people to objectify their partners (so is looksmaxxing, because to objectify yourself usually causes you to objectify your partner)
Rant over.
Tbh right, in the last year or two I’ve come to accept that there is an absolute religious continuity from ancient paganism to the newest mainstream ones (e.gChristianity and islam). It might be a vague connection at times but you can see pretty clearly how one story or one ritual became different as a culture moved into a new age or a new area.
The words “Zeus,” and Deus and Jupiter all come from the same root word.
Every religion has a flood story
Religious texts reflect on the old faiths that their founders were raised in, or those worshipped by them around them
Anyway why am I saying all this? Well, I don’t know if God would actually go "You need to make a new religion. It tends to be "you need to fix the current religion, take control of it.
EDIT: I should have read ahead to see just how silly this greentext actually is before I engaged with it as a serious idea, lol.
Ungay: anon is a woman too.
Completlely flips the script, doesn’t it?